« La « météorite » du 2 janvier, dans le New Jersey, n'en était pas une » : différence entre les versions
| [version non vérifiée] | [version non vérifiée] |
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
m add quotes |
|||
Ligne 9 :
Earlier during the incident, scientists from Rutgers examined the object visually along with police who were at the scene, and determined it was a meteorite. But further tests by geologists confirmed that it was not a meteorite, but probably a metal piece from a rocket or satellite. They had earlier thought it was made of [[w:iron|iron]].
"That's the nature of science. If the conclusion from the test says it's not a meteorite, then it's not a meteorite. We have to move forward," said Srinivasan Nageswaran, an individual belonging to the family that found the object.
==Related News==
| |||